Huawei Watch GT 3 SE smartwatch in review: Is the barely cheaper offshoot of the Watch GT 3 worth it?

Huawei positions the new Watch GT 3 SE as a cheaper sports version of the well-known and already tested by us Huawei Watch GT 3 . According to the recommended retail price of 179 Euros (~$179), this is also fitting, as the sports version is noticeably cheaper than the Watch GT 3 with an MSRP of 209 Euros (~$209). However, the prices for the Huawei Watch GT 3 have already dropped quite a bit, so the price difference is smaller.

For example, the black Huawei Watch GT 3 Active Edition with a sports strap is already available for around 175 Euros (e. g. at Amazon ).

Thus, it hardly costs more than the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE, which has hardly dropped in price so far. The differences between the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE, which is available in the two colors Graphite Black (black) and Wilderness Green (gray), are very limited compared with the Active Edition of the Huawei Watch GT 3, which is available in two sizes. This raises the question of who the new model is suitable for and how it can stand out from the well-known smartwatch.

As usual for the manufacturer’s smartwatches, the setup is done via the Huawei Health app. The process is well explained in the app, which is available for iOS and Android (download via QR code and not the Play Store) as well as HarmonyOS and establishes a pairing of the smartwatch with the smartphone via Bluetooth. The process was successful in the test with an iPhone 13 Pro .

Various settings for the smartwatch can be made via the Huawei Health app, for example, which health data should be collected regularly. It also allows firmware updates and access to additional watch faces, among other things. Ten of them are installed on the smartwatch out of the box.

Convenient: information about the respective power consumption is available for the individual watch faces. While you have to do without the ECG function of the more expensive Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro (from approx. 290 Euros at Amazon ), the SE model with its optical sensor on the back provides many important and common health functions.

In addition to the 24-hour heart rate measurement, these also include the determination the blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), activity recordings, sleep and stress tracking, and breathing exercises. The evaluations are performed directly on the wrist and in the Huawei Health app on the smartphone. Data can be synchronized with Apple Health and Google Fit.

The accuracy of the heart rate sensor could be a bit higher according to our impressions in the test. Compared to a Polar H10 chest strap as a reference device, the watch showed a downward deviation of almost four percent (51 to 53 beats) in the resting heart rate, which is still within limits. The watch also displayed significantly lower values on average in the performance measurement, sometimes falling short of the chest strap’s value by more than ten beats.

Thus, the difference of almost ten percent at the end of the measurement is quite large, as a comparison of the curves also shows. According to our impressions, we do not recommend the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE for accurate measurements during sports. According to Huawei, the wearable has a high-precision GNSS positioning chip with five systems supported.

Similar to the heart rate measurement, however, the GPS detection of the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE is not quite as accurate as we would have liked. Here, it competes against the Garmin Venu 2 as the reference model. The measurement of the cycling route is generally decent, but the deviations are quite large, especially in corners and curves.

The data recorded with regard to the distance covered (deviation of about 170 m or 2 percent) and average speed (0. 3 km/h or just under 2 percent) are within limits. The recording of the altitude profile did not work as well.

Here, Huawei’s smartwatch outputs a significantly lower value of only 10 meters than Garmin’s 75 meters. We also noticed that the initial connection via GPS took quite a long time (30+ seconds). That can be annoying at the start of a workout.

As in the 46 mm Watch GT 3, Huawei also installs a 1. 43-inch round AMOLED display with a touchscreen in the SE variant. It has a resolution of 466 x 466 pixels and thus a high pixel density of 326 PPI.

It is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass. The screen is also easy to read in direct sunlight thanks to a good 500 cd/m². If you want, you can activate an always-on display option in the settings, but you will have to reckon with a shorter battery life.

The battery of the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE has a capacity of 455 mAh. Thus, it does not differ from the Huawei Watch GT 3 with the same size of 46 mm. Subjectively, the SE edition even scores a bit better in terms of battery life.

The manufacturer promises up to 14 days, which can also be achieved with infrequent use. The battery should be recharged about once a week during intensive use, which proved to be realistic in our test. Charging is done with a USB-A cable that is about 80 cm long and holds magnetically to the watch.

A charger is not included. Huawei positions the Watch GT 3 SE as a sporty smartwatch. In the end, it offers virtually the same functions as the Huawei Watch GT 3.

The Huawei Watch GT 3 SE masters the actual core competence of sports tracking with over 100 sports modes, but it is unfortunately not always very accurate in terms of heart rate and GPS performance measurements in our test. We would have hoped for a bit more from a sporty smartwatch. However, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE does a good job in many aspects in our test, even though it is not free of criticism.

Among other things, it offers a bright AMOLED screen, many features, and a convincing battery life. In the end, the question remains why you should buy the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE when the more sophisticated Huawei Watch GT 3 in the Active Edition (in two sizes) is available for a little more money and the equally light and in many respects also identical Huawei Watch GT Runner which is even available for less. Apart from the slightly different, but subjectively less chic design, the SE model hardly provides any arguments in the test that can set it apart from the other models.

.