Baidu Begins Paid Robotaxi Service In China With No Employee Aboard

Transportation Baidu Begins Paid Robotaxi Service In China With No Employee Aboard Brad Templeton Senior Contributor Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. I cover robocar technology & previously worked on Google’s car team. New! Follow this author to improve your content experience.

Got it! Aug 7, 2022, 10:00pm EDT | New! Click on the conversation bubble to join the conversation Got it! Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin A Baidu Apollo Robotaxi travels with no safety driver in the vehicle in China Baidu Baidu BIDU has announced they have received permits to operate a paid Robotaxi service in China, with no human safety driver aboard the vehicle. Previously, they have been operating with human operators either behind the wheel or in the passengers seat. Baidu says they will immediately start operations in Chongqing and Wuhan, two large cities in central China.

They have previously been operating, with the passenger seat operator in some cases, in several eastern Chinese cities. Service will only be from roughly 9 to 5, in a 13 square km region of Wuhan and a 30 square km region in the Yongchuan district of Chongqing. The region of Wuhan is a special area with 321km of approved roads, 106km of which have special 5G which allows for low latency remote monitoring and even allows remote driving of the vehicles.

What’s notable about this is the removal of the human from the car. For the outside public, it’s very hard to measure the level of progress of a robocar team. Everybody publishes very nice videos of their cars taking drives and solving various problems.

The trouble is you can make a video like that at almost any level of progress, if you cherry pick what you show. As such, we have to measure teams by what risks they are willing to take and how many people they will allow to see all facets of operation. The decision to go with no human in the vehicle means there was a big presentation by the team to the board where they showed the vehicle was good enough to release in this way, with members of the public and nobody to grab the wheel or hit emergency stop if a problem arises.

That tells us that the team made a convincing case, and the quality is good — or perhaps that the team is reckless, which we will know soon enough. Baidu claims 32 million km of operations to date. Baidu states that while there is remote monitoring, they have roughly 2-3 vehicles per remote monitor, so it’s not a 1:1 ratio.

The vehicles must do pick-up/drop-off at designated stops, rather than just anywhere there’s a free curb the way human drivers do. “PuDo” is its own problem which not all teams have solved yet. (Cruise got in trouble for just doing PuDo in the street without pulling off, though at night this is common for taxis.

) The other measure of the team’s own self-appraisal of how far along is whether they will allow the public to see random rides. Again, it’s not so hard to take a guest member of the press along on a pre-planned and well tested route. If you allow members of the public to ride any where, any time, you show you are confident this will work.

Some teams require the riders to sign NDAs and not to make videos. More confident teams have allowed anybody to release these videos. Again, this says the company’s own testing has told them their vehicle will not embarrass them in the videos.

Baidu says riders may make and publish videos of their rides, so those will be interesting to see. MORE FOR YOU Tesla Challenger Polestar Powers Up With Nasdaq Listing Plan Valuing It At $20 Billion Driver Killed By His Own Car Door While Waiting In Line At Fast-Food Drive-Thru, Providing Cautionary Insights For AI Self-Driving Cars Tesla Cofounder’s Recycling Startup Plans To Become EV Battery Material Powerhouse It is not enough to allow this of course. Tesla TSLA is actually most open of all, and has allowed over 100,000 of their customers to try out their prototype driving system, including myself.

It does not allow operation without supervision of course. Having allowed this, Tesla has revealed that their system is extremely low quality and strongly needs that supervision, so it doesn’t get high marks for quality, but it does get high marks for letting us see the quality. Those who won’t let us see the quality may be presumed to be even worse than Tesla.

To a minor extent, this also means they have convinced regulators of this, but the truth is the regulators are not really capable of assessing the quality of a robocar. Even the teams are figuring out exactly how to do that, but they are the only ones with much inkling. What they dare to do shows what their own evaluations have said.

In the USA, Waymo has been operating vehicles in Arizona with no supervising driver for several years now. More recently, Cruise began such operations at night in a limited area of downtown SF, and Waymo also began operations there at all hours, but has not started fully uncrewed service. The ability to charge money is not a major step, though it has often touted highly.

Nobody is trying to run these services as a business as yet. Charging money lets them see how the public reacts to the service when they have to pay for it, and to experiment with other types of charging. At present, most services are just doing charging similar to or slightly less than Uber UBER .

A robotaxi service must eventually be a fair bit les than Uber, and probably done with an entirely different pricing structure that’s not just a price per mile. Baidu Apollo taxi service is 16 yuan plus 2. 8 yuan/km, comparable to human driven services in some areas of China.

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn . Check out my website . Brad Templeton Editorial Standards Print Reprints & Permissions.