Acer Swift X 16 review: the anti-MacBook Pro

Acer Swift X 16 MSRP $1,600. 00 Score Details DT Recommended Product “The Acer Swift X 16 will draw you in with its OLED display and keep you around with its excellent performance. ” Pros Superfast productivity performance Good midrange creativity performance Good value Exceptional OLED display Solid build quality Cons Keyboard isn’t the best Battery life is below average A bit thick If you’re looking for a larger laptop for creative work, then you’ll find a bunch of options.

Of course, the MacBook Pro is the first you’ll come across. But not everyone wants a Mac or has the cash on hand to afford it. Contents Specs and configurations Not truly thin and light More than competitive performance A top-of-the-line OLED display Another competent option for lighter creativity Enter Acer’s latest Swift X 16, which technically fits into the company’s thin-and-light category while promising good enough performance for less demanding creators.

And even though the Swift X 16 isn’t all that thin or light, it’s a relatively affordable choice for this amount of performance. As it turns out, the Swift X 16 offers just enough speed to keep up with similarly priced machines, along with an OLED display that provides some of the best colors I’ve seen on a laptop of this type. Related The HP Envy 16 costs less, but the mighty MacBook Pro 16 retains its top spot This tiny ThinkPad can’t quite keep up with the MacBook Air M2 The Lenovo Slim Pro is the best answer to the MacBook Pro I’ve seen yet Specs and configurations Acer Swift X 16 Dimensions 14.

03 x 9. 82 x 0. 85-1.

06 inches Weight 4. 25 pounds Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 RAM 16GB Display 16. 0-inch 16:10 WQXGA (2560 x 1600) IPS, 165Hz 16.

0-inch 16:10 WQXGA+ (3200 x 2000) OLED, 120Hz Storage 1TB SSD Touch No Ports 2 x USB-C USB4 1 x USB-A 3. 2 Gen 2 1 x USB-A 3. 2 Gen 1 1 x HDMI 2.

1 1 x 3. 5mm audio jack 1 x microSD card reader Wireless Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5. 2 Webcam 1080p Operating system Windows 11 Battery 76 watt-hours Price $1,250+ Acer offers two configurations of the Swift X 16 (SFX16-61G to refer to the specific product).

The entry-level model comes in at $1,250 for an AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS CPU, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 GPU, and a 16. 0-inch WQXGA IPS display running at up to 165Hz. For $1,600, the CPU is upgraded to a Ryzen 9 7940U, the GPU to an RTX 4050, and the display to a WQXGA+ OLED panel at up to 120Hz.

The HP Envy 16 is a little more expensive at $1,750 for an Intel Core i7-13700H, the same amount of RAM and storage, and a faster RTX 4060 GPU. You have to pay a lot more with the HP for an OLED display, though, and even then, it isn’t as sharp or colorful as Acer’s option. Not truly thin and light Mark Coppock / Digital Trends As mentioned in the introduction, Acer includes this laptop in its Swift lineup, which usually focuses on being thin and light.

The Swift X 16 isn’t really that, though, at up to 1. 06 inches thick and weighing 4. 25 pounds.

It’s not that heavy, but quite a few other 16-inch laptops with similar specs are thinner. The HP Envy 16, for example, weighs 5. 12 pounds but is just 0.

78 inches thick, while the Dell XPS 15 weighs about the same at 4. 23 pounds but it’s 0. 71 inches thick.

The 16-inch MacBook Pro is also thinner at 0. 64 inches thick. The Swift X 16 is built well, though, with no bending, flexing, or twisting anywhere in the all-aluminum lid or chassis.

It’s not quite as rigid as the XPS 15 but it’s close, and it feels more durable than the Envy 16. Only the plastic display bezels detract from an overall high-quality quality feel. Aesthetically, the Swift X 16 is simply designed with an all-grey color scheme that’s only broken up by the black keyboard.

The lines are aggressive, especially at the rear where the lower edge of the display is quite angular. The XPS 15 and Envy 16 are both more attractive laptops, but the Swift X 16 is just fine as well. Just a little bland compared to something like the MacBook Pro.

Mark Coppock / Digital Trends I didn’t like the keyboard, though. The keycaps are a little small and the spacing is a little tight, primarily to fit in a numeric keypad that I don’t think is likely to be in high demand on a modern laptop. The switches were also quite loose, which is a shame because they’re quite snappy.

A little firmer action and I’d rate the keyboard as close to the XPS 15. Apple’s Magic Keyboard on modern MacBook Pros remains the best, however. The Swift X 16’s touchpad is quite large and takes up most of the space on the palm rest, and its button clicks were confident and quiet.

Connectivity was good, with plenty of modern and legacy ports. This is an AMD machine, though, so no Thunderbolt 4 support. Wireless connectivity was up to date.

Finally, the webcam runs at 1080p and is fine for the usual videoconferencing needs. There’s no infrared camera for Windows 11 facial recognition support, but the fingerprint reader embedded in the power button worked well. More than competitive performance Mark Coppock / Digital Trends My Swift X 16 review unit used AMD’s latest Ryzen 9 7940HS, an 8-core/16-thread CPU running at up to 5.

2GHz. It clocks between 35 and 54 watts, making it a strong competitor to Intel’s 45-watt chips. My review unit also equipped the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 running on Nvidia’s Studio drivers.

In our benchmarks, the Swift X 16 was competitive with laptops running the Intel Core i7-13700H and Core i9-13900H. That was particularly apparent in our Handbrake benchmark which encodes a 420MB video as H. 265, and in the Cinebench R23 benchmark.

The Swift X 16 also did well in the Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark, which runs in a live version of Adobe’s video editing app and uses the GPU to speed up certain tasks. Even with just an RTX 4050, the Acer was competitive with laptops running theoretically faster GPUs. Mark Coppock / Digital Trends Overall, performance is a strength.

The Swift X 16 will plow through the most demanding productivity workflows, and it will provide decent performance to less demanding creators. The Swift X 16 isn’t more than an entry-level gaming laptop, but it did manage around 80 frames per second in Fortnite at 1200p and epic graphics. Geekbench (single/multi) Handbrake (seconds) Cinebench R23 (single/multi) Pugetbench Premiere Pro Acer Swift X 16 (Ryzen 9 7940 HS/RTX 4050) Bal: 1,840 / 11,741 Perf: 1,893 / 11,681 Bal: 64 Perf: 64 Bal: 1,793 / 16,407 Perf: 1,799 / 16,760 Bal: 567 Perf: 568 Dell Inspiron 16 Plus (Core i7-13700H/RTX 4060) Bal: 1,812 / 12,309 Perf: 1,773 / 12,693 Bal: 74 Perf: 79 Bal: 1,855 / 12,480 Perf: 1,867 / 13,535 Bal: 606 Perf: 627 HP Envy 16 (2023) (Core i9-13900H/RTX 4060) Bal: 1,997 / 12,742 Perf: 1,992 / 12,645 Bal: 73 Perf: 75 Bal: 1,944 / 15,596 Perf: 1,954 / 15,422 Bal: 544 Perf: 608 MSI Prestige 16 Studio (Core i7-13700H/RTX 4060) Bal: 1,880 / 6,951 Perf: 1,903 / 11,945 Bal: 139 Perf: 80 Bal: 1,797 / 7,959 Perf: 1,921 / 13,647 Bal: 460 Perf: 521 Dell XPS 15 (9530) (Core i7-13700H/RTX 4070) Bal: 1,787 / 11,978 Perf: 1,830 / 11,769 Bal: 79 Perf: 76 Bal: 1,865 / 13,386 Perf: 1,868 / 13,927 N/A Dell XPS 17 (9730) (Core i7-13700H/RTX 4070) Bal: 1,901 / 12,654 Perf: 1,928 / 12,911 Bal: 79 Perf: 71 Bal: 1,933 / 13,384 Perf: 1,912 / 15,462 Bal: 568 Perf: 614 Unsurprisingly, the Swift X 16 didn’t get great battery life.

It has a 76-watt-hour battery, which is on the low end for a large laptop, and its OLED display is power-hungry. But these results aren’t terrible for a machine that can handle demanding tasks, although if you’re mobile the large power brick will weigh you down. Web browsing Video Acer Swift X 16 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) 6 hours, 28 minutes 7 hours, 48 minutes Dell Inspiron 16 Plus (Core i7-13700H) 9 hours, 8 minutes 7 hours, 36 minutes HP Envy 16 (2023) (Core i9-13900H) 5 hours, 56 minutes 7 hours, 47 minutes Dell XPS 15 (9530) (Core i7-13700H) 9 hours, 43 minutes 11 hours, 46 minutes Dell XPS 17 (9730) (Core i7-13700H) 4 hours, 46 minutes 5 hours, 17 minutes A top-of-the-line OLED display Mark Coppock / Digital Trends Most OLED displays are uniformly excellent, looking great out of the box with dynamic colors, plenty of brightness, and deep, inky blacks.

The Swift X 16’s high-res version is no different. It also benefits from a fast 120Hz refresh rate that makes Windows 11 a lot smoother, something that’s more common on recent displays. According to my colorimeter, the Swift X 16’s panel is among the best we’ve tested.

It was brighter than most, albeit not by that much, and its blacks were perfect with the incredible contrast we’ve come to expect from the technology. It stood out most in its colors, with a near-perfect score of 100% sRGB, 99% AdobeRGB, and 100% DCI-P3 coverage. Its accuracy was also excellent at a DeltaE of 0.

70, well below the 1. 0 mark where the human eye can no longer tell the difference. Note that my colorimeter wouldn’t return a contrast ratio value, which has happened with a number of OLED displays.

But with perfect blacks, there’s no doubt that the Swift X 16’s display has the same deep contrast as other OLED panels. This is a great display for productivity workers, creators, and media consumers. Acer offers a lower-resolution IPS panel running at up to 165Hz on the lower-power base model, but it’s worth the extra money for the OLED panel alone.

Brightness (nits) Contrast sRGB gamut AdobeRGB gamut Accuracy DeltaE (lower is better) Acer Swift X 16 (OLED) 406 N/A 100% 99% 0. 70 Dell Inspiron 16 Plus (IPS) 308 1,510:1 98% 76% 1. 19 HP Envy 16 (2023) (IPS) 395 1,010:1 97% 73% 1.

01 Dell XPS 15 9530 (OLED) 358 24,850:1 100% 96% 1. 31 Dell XPS 17 9730 (IPS) 501 1,570:1 100% 100% 1. 33 MSI Prestige 16 Studio (mini-LED) 455 3,140:1 98% 82% 3.

46 Apple MacBook Pro 14 (XDR) 511 34,450:1 100% 89% 1. 13 Two stereo speakers fire down from the front bottom of the chassis, and they’re surprisingly weak. That is, they put out minimal volume even when turned all the way up.

Mids and clears are high and there’s a touch of bass, so that’s good. But if you want to entertain a group of people, you’ll want external speakers. Another competent option for lighter creativity The Swift X 16 provides excellent performance for demanding productivity work and enough power to handle less creative workflows — especially for this price.

Creators will have to spend a lot more to get significantly better performance, but for everyone else, the Swift X 16 is an affordable option. It also offers enough quality to meet its premium price, and its OLED display is superb. The Swift X 16 is a solid choice in the growing field of 16-inch laptops.

Editors’ Recommendations This Acer OLED laptop (almost) beats the MacBook Air 15 — and it’s cheaper The Dell XPS 15 has one major advantage over the MacBook Pro This powerhouse laptop gives the MacBook Pro an honest run for its money MacBook Pro M2 Pro/M2 Max buying guide: how to make the right choice Samsung Galaxy Book 3 Ultra vs. MacBook Pro 16-inch.