Kerala governor flouting all norms on Centre-state relations

Kerala is witnessing the spectacle of a governor who is out of control. One day he is demanding the resignation of all the vice chancellors of Kerala universities and on another day he “withdraws pleasure” from a minister in the government and asks the chief minister to remove him from the cabinet. Utilising a Supreme Court verdict which struck down the appointment of the vice chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, the governor, Arif Mohammad Khan, acting as the chancellor, demanded that the vice chancellors of nine state universities resign from their positions by 11.

30 am on October 25.  The letter demanding this was sent on October 24. Eight vice chancellors refused to resign and went to the High Court against the move by the governor.

The ninth VC was the one removed by the Supreme Court verdict. Just before their petition was to be heard in court, the governor backtracked and sent a show cause notice to the vice chancellors to respond by November 3 as to why they should not be removed from their posts due to irregularities in the process of appointment. Subsequently, the governor has sent a similar show cause notice to two more vice chancellors.

  This latest action by the governor comes in the wake of a series of egregious moves in the recent past.  Earlier, the governor had questioned the reappointment of the vice chancellor of Kannur University after having signed his appointment order. This appointment, which was challenged, was upheld by the Kerala High Court.

 More recently, the governor has been waging a battle against the Kerala University vice chancellor and the senate. He sought to bypass the provisions of the Act regarding the nature of the search committee to select a person for the post of vice chancellor which was falling vacant.  When the senate resisted such illegal methods, fifteen members of the senate were arbitrarily removed from the membership of the senate.

  In the current move against the vice chancellors, it must be noted that all of them were appointed vice chancellors by the governor in his capacity as chancellor of these universities. Under the statutes governing these universities, the chancellor cannot remove a person from the post of vice chancellor of his own accord.  For instance, the statutes of these universities provide that a vice chancellor can be proceeded against for financial misappropriation or misbehaviour.

An enquiry has to be conducted by a judge of the High Court into such charges. Therefore, the threat of dismissal of vice chancellors by the governor is illegal and violates the statutes.   The Supreme Court verdict on the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University was regarding the specific appointment made at that university and the alleged violation of procedures in that case.

The governor’s move to make this verdict applicable to the appointment of vice chancellors of other universities is without any legal basis.  The statutes of some of the universities provides for a nominee of the state government in the search committee, apart from the UGC nominee and the university nominee.  This is the pattern followed in some other states too like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

The governor’s stand that there should not be a nominee of the state government in the selection committee is untenable.   What exactly is the motive behind Khan’s actions? He argues that he is taking steps to protect the autonomy of the universities and to prevent the nominees of the ruling party being made vice chancellors. This is only a camouflage for intervening in the state universities to advance the agenda of the RSS and the BJP.

The misuse of the post of chancellor by Khan is not an isolated issue. In many Opposition-ruled states, the governors have been interfering in the affairs of state universities and creating hurdles in the appointment of vice chancellors and key personnel.  The latest instance of this is in Punjab, wherethe governor, Banwarilal Purohit, had rejected the appointment of a noted cardiologist as the vice chancellor of Baba Farid University of Health Sciences.

After that, the governor asked the chief minister to remove the vice chancellor of Punjab Agricultural University, terming his appointment as “illegal”. It is in order to stop the arbitrary interference by governors in state universities that new laws or amendments to existing laws concerning state universities have been adopted by the state assemblies of Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Kerala.  In Kerala, the assembly passed the University Laws (Amendment) Bill on September 1, this year.

 The amendment has increased the strength of the selection committee to select nominees for vice chancellor to five from the existing three. But the governor has not given assent to the Bill, nor has he returned the bill with any query or objections. When faced with criticism about his obstructionist role, Khan threatened to withdraw his “pleasure” from any minister who dares to criticise him.

 He has now announced that he has “withdrawn pleasure” from the finance minister, K N Balagopal, and asked the chief minister to remove him from the cabinet. Thus, he has begun to exercise powers that he does not possess under the Constitution. The remedy to governors’ interference in the appointment of vice chancellors is to stop the practice of making governors as chancellors of universities.

This was the recommendation of the M. M.  Punchhi Commission on Centre-state relations appointed by the UPA government.

 The commission had recommended ending the convention of appointing governors as chancellors of universities.   The struggle against the governor interfering in higher educational institutions in Kerala is important.  What the governor is doing is part of the centralised drive to impose the RSS agenda for higher education in the country.

 (IPA Service) Views are personal.